Translate | Traducir

dijous, 15 de setembre de 2016

La Fiscalía pide 6 años de cárcel para Griñán y 10 de inhabilitación a Chaves por el caso de los ERE


La Fiscalía Anticorrupción pide 6 años de prisión y 30 de inhabilitación para el expresidente socialista andaluz José Antonio Griñán por un delito continuado de malversación y otro de prevaricación en el caso de los ERE, y 10 años de inhabilitación para su antecesor, Manuel Chaves, por prevaricación. Ambos se dieron de baja del PSOE hace tres meses tras ser procesados en la rama política de esta macrocausa, cuyo juicio se celebrará previsiblemente en 2017.
Más...




Rubalcaba, Madina, Chacón y Elena Valenciano secundan a Susana Díaz, que rechaza que Sánchez forme Gobierno


PEDRO SÁNCHEZ, EL ACTUAL LÍDER DEL PSOE, PODRÍA SER UN INFILTRADO DEL PP




Sarkozy se atreve a dudar en público del cambio climático


POLITICO.- French presidential hopeful Nicolas Sarkozy suggested climate change isn’t caused by man, a French weekly reported Wednesday.

“Climate has been changing for four billion years,” the former president told a panel of business leaders this week, the weekly Marianne reported. “Sahara has become a desert, it isn’t because of industry. You need to be as arrogant as men are to believe we changed the climate.”

Sarkozy has been critical of climate change coverage in the media before, saying that too much attention was focused on international climate talks last December: “They are only talking about the COP21.” He said media should have focused on the terror attacks that killed 130 people in Paris in November instead of covering the climate summit.
Más...







El más alto tribunal catalán avala juzgar a Artur Mas por prevaricación y desobediencia en la consulta del 9-N



Así fueron las últimas 24 horas de Rita Barberá en el PP


ABC.-Apenas pasaban de las doce del mediodía del martes cuando se conoció la noticia de la apertura de causa contra Rita Barberá por el Tribunal Supremo. En el Senado esperaban que esa misma tarde acudiera a la constitución de las dos comisiones de las que es vocal, la Constitucional y la de Economía. «Ya está de camino», comentaban extraoficialmente ante la curiosidad de los periodistas. Pero el viaje se frustró; Barberá dio la vuelta, y comenzó entonces un intensísimo cruce de llamadas entre Génova, Galicia, País Vasco y Valencia.

Rajoy estaba en Orense; Cospedal también en Galicia, y el vicesecretario de Organización, Fernando Martínez-Maillo, en San Sebastián. Los teléfonos comenzaron a echar humo, dando y recibiendo instrucciones. En especial los de los dos últimos, encargados más directos de hablar con Rita y convencerla de lo conveniente de una marcha atrás voluntaria y lo más rápida posible.

Fueron 30 horas de actividad frenética que los responsables de la dirección del PP pasaron volcados en convencer a la exalcaldesa de Valencia de que diera voluntariamente un paso atrás. Una negociación «muy complicada, la más dura», confesaba alguno de sus protagonistas, que se llevó a cabo por teléfono durante toda la tarde del martes y todo el día del miércoles, y en la que no han faltado las lágrimas. «No ha sido agradable», confesaban. Al final, tras mucho presionar, «hubo que apretarla» con la advertencia de que el partido tendría que expulsarla si no se iba de forma voluntaria. Sólo entonces la exalcaldesa cedió a primera hora de la tarde de ayer.
Más...








¿Por qué los demócratas no pueden reemplazar a Hillary?


AMERICAN THINKER.- With the much publicized recent health scare regarding Hillary Clinton, there are rumors of the Democrat National Committee seriously considering replacing her. Here is why they can't.

In a nutshell, it is the Clinton Family Foundation. With millions of dollars collected from donors, including foreign governments, it is hardly a secret that those donors expect their money's worth – not in charity, but in influence. A Clinton in the White House will be the one and only avenue of repayment to those donors.

No one else will do – not even another Democrat. No one outside the Clinton family will reliably honor those agreements.

This creates enormous potential difficulties, if not outright catastrophe, for the Democratic Party. If Hillary does not win the presidency, those donors are going to be very, shall we say, disappointed – or may we go so far as to say, very angry? At a minimum, we may expect that they will demand refunds of their money. Unless kept secret – and how could it be? – word of the corruption and criminality will become public, and its wide-ranging implications will be thoroughly investigated by a Trump administration.

If she does win, however, Mrs. Clinton will clearly be unable to perform the exhausting duties of the presidency. What then?

The Clintons anticipated that problem, which is why Hillary has already averred that she will place her husband in charge of the economy. A major part of a working plan would be for her to appoint her husband as secretary of state, which would place Bill Clinton in position to effectively exercise all the powers of the presidency using Hillary's authority. The foundation donors will be pleased with that arrangement, because they can then collect their pound of flesh from the American taxpayer.

Should Mrs. Clinton become so obviously unable to carry out the duties of the presidency that the incapacity could not be disguised, the normal procedure would be for succession in the following order: the vice president, the speaker of the House – and then the senior cabinet member, which would be, oh my, Bill Clinton. Although it seems that no president can serve more than two terms, a Clinton Supreme Court might easily find an emergency exception, emanating from a penumbra of the Constitution.

In such a case, Bill Clinton would have only two three [including the Senate president pro tem –ed.] people separating him from becoming a third-term president. I would hate to be either any of them.

Fragmento del documento hackeado al comité Nacional Demócrata sobre las donaciones extranjeras a la Fundación Clinton y la Biblioteca Presidencial Bill Clinton

FOREIGN GOVERNMENT DONATIONS TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION WHILE HILLARY WAS A U.S. SENATOR

* “As of 2008, the Clinton Foundation raised at least $46 million from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Brunei, Oman, and other foreign governments–the very governments Secretary of State Hillary Clinton eventually negotiated with. ” [Breitbart, 8/14/13]

* As Of January 2009, “Saudi Arabia, Norway And Other Foreign Governments Gave At Least $46 Million” To The Clinton Foundation “And Donors With Ties To India Delivered Millions More.” [Associated Press, 1/18/09]

* “According to Clinton's list, Saudi Arabia gave $10 million to $25 million to the foundation. Other government donors include Norway, Kuwait, Qatar, Brunei, Oman, Italy, Jamaica and Tenerife in the Canary Islands. The Dutch national lottery gave $5 million to $10 million.” [Associated Press,1/18/09]

* “AUSAID, the Australian government's overseas aid program, and COPRESIDA-Secretariado Tecnico, a Dominican Republic government agency formed to fight AIDS, each gave $10 million to $25 million.” [Associated Press, 1/18/09]
Más...